"Titillate" is such an apt word. But maybe the first syllable isn't comprehensive enough for those of us who are more focused on a different portion of the female anatomy? And the way that first photo is cropped makes me wonder if it might have come from someone into carpets... Oh wait. Now I see what he was focused on.
I have the whole video of number 5 and it is a long hard hand spanking with her protesting all the time. The plot(?) is her coming home late and not calling. A lot of good ones today.
I tend to stay away from “perverted”. You and others embrace the term, but some use it to refer to sexual activity that crosses the line. I felt guilty about my predilections for far too long, until my wife indulged fully and then some.
I frequently use words such as perverted in jest. I don't feel guilty about my spanking fetish. I embrace it. I don't tend to open a conversation with a stranger about it. I would not discuss sex unless they opened the door. Wait, I have asked women numerous times if they needed a spanking.
In the second picture, there is a radio. Really. The late Queen favored a Roberts radio. I wonder if this was one, as the grill matches ones I have seen, and the model is British.
No, it is a wireless set from the 40s or 50s. Roberts were portable radios that first appeared in the early 1960s, my mother had one. Then they were medium and long wave only. Today inside the identical case there are FM and digital wavebands, with Bluetooth connectability. Although portable, the originals had to be plugged into a mains socket, today they are rechargeable.
It doesn't take much to titillate my perverted mind -- and any of one these photos more than does the trick. Thanks for your work in keeping me titillated!
Something about the removal of panties and exposing the bare bottom for a spanking has always been “titillating “ for me. If you prepare it properly , the finished results are slyways perfect
Somehow taking them down for a spanking is more titillating for me than taking them down for sex. Tho my dim memory thinks the woman usually took her panties down for sex.
Going off-topic, I giggle when I read that men consider taking her panties down causes her embarrassment/humiliation. More likely, she thinks of bashing the guy if he does not take them down.
They also think the diaper position causes embarrassment/humiliation. When she puts her legs over my shoulders, is she embarrassed?
From what women I have spanked told me was that having me place them in position and removing their panties only increased their anxiety for the spanking to come. Actually most loved the slow carefully lowering of the undergarment and the gentle caressing of their bottoms followed by that first sharp slap.
I agree with you about panties snd sex. Every woman I knew took their own panties off for sex. Half the time before I had my shorts off.
I was going to quibble with you on their being anxious. But, on reflection, there were three that were always apprehensive.
I was spanking a gal on her lunch hour while I had a break between classes. We would meet at my place. I don't recall how it got started, but I would say, "You wanna see a trick?" We would then race to get our clothes off. I never won. She was on her back, legs spread, before I finished.
Thanks for the memorable pic (#5) of Shadow Lane mainstay Brian Tarsis imparting a sizzling rubescent patina to the legendarily and divinely well-sculpted bottom globes of long-retired fetish actress of the 80s & 90s, Tanya Foxx!
"Titillate" is such an apt word. But maybe the first syllable isn't comprehensive enough for those of us who are more focused on a different portion of the female anatomy? And the way that first photo is cropped makes me wonder if it might have come from someone into carpets... Oh wait. Now I see what he was focused on.
ReplyDeleteI have the whole video of number 5 and it is a long hard hand spanking with her protesting all the time. The plot(?) is her coming home late and not calling.
ReplyDeleteA lot of good ones today.
I think that is a rather old video. Since bottoms have not evolved in the last many decades, it's up to date.
DeleteTitillate is right.
ReplyDeleteI tend to stay away from “perverted”. You and others embrace the term, but some use it to refer to sexual activity that crosses the line. I felt guilty about my predilections for far too long, until my wife indulged fully and then some.
I frequently use words such as perverted in jest. I don't feel guilty about my spanking fetish. I embrace it. I don't tend to open a conversation with a stranger about it. I would not discuss sex unless they opened the door. Wait, I have asked women numerous times if they needed a spanking.
DeleteThe second picture is the ever attractive Ariadna Majewska, with a look that hints at profound naughtiness. #4 poetry in motion.
ReplyDeleteYou sure know the models. Would that be a Roberts radio?
DeleteWhat radio??
DeleteIn the second picture, there is a radio. Really. The late Queen favored a Roberts radio. I wonder if this was one, as the grill matches ones I have seen, and the model is British.
DeleteNo, it is a wireless set from the 40s or 50s. Roberts were portable radios that first appeared in the early 1960s, my mother had one. Then they were medium and long wave only. Today inside the identical case there are FM and digital wavebands, with Bluetooth connectability. Although portable, the originals had to be plugged into a mains socket, today they are rechargeable.
DeleteIt doesn't take much to titillate my perverted mind -- and any of one these photos more than does the trick. Thanks for your work in keeping me titillated!
ReplyDeletePlease to get you fired up and aroused. At a distance. Grin
DeleteLove them all!! Very titillating indeed!!!
ReplyDeleteSomething about the removal of panties and exposing the bare bottom for a spanking has always been “titillating “ for me.
ReplyDeleteIf you prepare it properly , the finished results are slyways perfect
Somehow taking them down for a spanking is more titillating for me than taking them down for sex. Tho my dim memory thinks the woman usually took her panties down for sex.
DeleteGoing off-topic, I giggle when I read that men consider taking her panties down causes her embarrassment/humiliation. More likely, she thinks of bashing the guy if he does not take them down.
They also think the diaper position causes embarrassment/humiliation. When she puts her legs over my shoulders, is she embarrassed?
From what women I have spanked told me was that having me place them in position and removing their panties only increased their anxiety for the spanking to come. Actually most loved the slow carefully lowering of the undergarment and the gentle caressing of their bottoms followed by that first sharp slap.
DeleteI agree with you about panties snd sex. Every woman I knew took their own panties off for sex. Half the time before I had my shorts off.
I was going to quibble with you on their being anxious. But, on reflection, there were three that were always apprehensive.
DeleteI was spanking a gal on her lunch hour while I had a break between classes. We would meet at my place. I don't recall how it got started, but I would say, "You wanna see a trick?" We would then race to get our clothes off. I never won. She was on her back, legs spread, before I finished.
Consider me titillated.
ReplyDeleteHappy to help with that
DeleteThanks for the memorable pic (#5) of Shadow Lane mainstay Brian Tarsis imparting
ReplyDeletea sizzling rubescent patina to the legendarily and divinely well-sculpted
bottom globes of long-retired fetish actress of the 80s & 90s, Tanya Foxx!
...a sizzling rubescent patina. Hot damn that's a good one.
ReplyDeleteBrian is doing a good job