Foolishness since 2007

Foolishness since 2007
Foolishness since 2007

Wednesday, March 6, 2013


Not too long ago, a blogger or commenter on some blog wrote about being disappointed in the film Secretary because the character, Lee, had recently been released from a brief stay in a mental hospital. They felt that her background tarnished the character. In the writer’s estimation it made her not quite normal, not fit to portray spanking in a mainstream film. I will not disagree with that, but I will share some personal observations.MV5BMjA5ODIzMTQ4M15BMl5BanBnXkFtZTYwMDgwNDA3._V1_SY317_CR0,0,214,317_


A lot of words have been written about this now decade old 2002 film. Before I get into it, I want to say we thought Maggie Gyllenhaal nailed the facial expressions. I will also say that I am not trained in clinical psychiatry.

We have known three women who were all highly submissive, deeply into the percussive arts, carried excess guilt and had been under physiatric care for years. So Lee’s background was not a surprise to us. In fact, it made her character believable. Lee may not the one you want to portray a spankette in a main stream film, but she was believable character to us.

I should mention that one of the three women was a “cutter” just like Lee. She had a fondest for the cane and single tail. If you can imagine taking a long hard paddling and then asking for the quirt then you know the pain level a cutter can tolerate. No, not tolerate, desire. And another of the women was a newly minted shrink, whose license to prescribe drugs was conditional on her remaining in therapy herself. She also had very high pain threshold and enough guilt to sink a ship.

Sometimes art does imitates life.


  1. Can't believe it was 2002. i enjoyed this film. I remember that there was almost complete silence in the cinema during the spanking scenes. Lots of people thinking they might like to be bent over I guess.

  2. I love this movie and borrowed my scene name from it. I know a lot of spankos hate it for the reasons you mentioned, portraying kink in a "bad light" and giving an impression that anyone into this stuff must be damaged in some way. I heard the same complaints regarding the back story of a 50 Shades character.

    I don't think all people should be painted with the same brush and definitely not indicated to be "damaged goods." But taking the movie for what it is, just a movie and not a how-to on BDSM, I love it. So many little things in the interactions between Lee and Mr. Grey are so spot on.

  3. I must admit to rather liking the film. The opening scene, along with Miss Gylenhaal's delightful face and wonderful eyes was priceless.


Comments are closed on this blog

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.