Consensual: existing or made by mutual consent without an act of writing.
I guess consensual includes men who talk their wives into spanking them for bad behavior. And that my friends, is where most F/M blogs live. The men commit a real life offence and earn a spanking. I can understand convincing the woman that the marriage will improve if they are spanked for improprieties so they can get the spankings they want. But, I wonder is a spanking as punishment a requirement for most folks? I get that most want some reason for being spanked. I am going to pick on my favorite spanking blogger, Ronnie. She devises a reason for her husband to spank her, but it’s never for bad behavior. To illustrate, she commented on a Spanko Brunch that she was spanked by the Head Chef for not completing my commis chef duties. That reason works for them.
Around here, spankings are consensual, but they are not earned. They are desired. They happen because we want them to happen. Bacall, come here and pull your pants down I am going to paddle you.
Or Bacall brings me a paddle and allows that a few pops would be welcome. Or she puts on spanking panties and making sure I see them. Or she might just tell me that she would be agreeable to walking to the woodshed. .
So I am saying our spankings are consensual, but never for bad behavior. This works for us. Would it work for you?
In most spanking stories and spanking video's, the spanking takes place as punishment. So I come back to my question, do most spankees need a reason for the spanking? Or put another way, would you be just as happy getting a spanking just because? We would be most interested in your answer. Feel free to comment anonymously.